Skip to main content

ace of hearts

I always found it a bit strange how, when talking love and relationships, most of my friends decided that love (platonic) and love (romantic) were entirely separate ideas. To me, love is just friendship with an extra step or two. Love is something that makes me want to snuggle up to my best friend after a long day. Love is something that makes a friendship that little bit extra special. But, that's about it. When I love someone, they're my best friend who I have cuteness aggression for and who I want to spoil. My friends always described love differently - something entirely new, something overwhelming, something with physical flutters in your stomach. I never really understood that. I put it down to being autistic for a long time, and honestly, maybe it just is. I don't know! All I know is that I don't really know what they're talking about.

On the outside, it looks a lot like I know what they're talking about. I have a wonderful girlfriend, who I love in my way. We're very publicly together, so all my friends kind of see me as The Lover Boy. They aren't wrong; I love love and I love loving. It's just... I don't know, different to how love gets described. Maybe it sounds bad to say I don't always get butterflies and a blush in my cheeks thinking about my girlfriend, maybe it sounds bad to say I don't relate to love stories and romance films. I'm coming to realise, though, that that's fine. I want to cuddle up to them, give them the world, spend my days with them. Maybe that's enough.

Sex is a weird one, though. I do, contrary to possibly popular belief, have sex. Good sex, actually! I love feeling closer to someone in that way, getting to know them in a whole new way. Do I feel anything intense towards sex? Absolutely not. I could really take it or leave it. Do I find people attractive, yes, I suppose I do, does it translate into anything else - a need to get in their pants - not really. To me, sex is a bonding activity the same way watching a movie is. It's fun, and can be nice and relaxing, not much more.

I guess that makes me some genre of asexual and aromantic. Moreso asexual than aromantic, maybe. It feels wrong to call myself that still, when I'm in a romantic relationship, if you want to consider it one. I love my relationship; it's incredibly fulfilling to have my little person by my side. I'm writing this to help myself process that it's okay, mostly. Maybe I'm just the ace of hearts - my girlfriend's heart, specifically.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"untoward mass reactions": antipsychiatry and nuclear weapons

Recently, I wrote an essay for a module on nuclear politics and strategy (yes, I am the classic international relations student, but I swear it’s in a red way, okay?). I was answering a question I’d put together myself – “Why is the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (1946) incomplete in its overview of the impacts of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima?” I formulated that essay question thinking it’s a pretty simple answer; the more subjective, emotional, human impacts go practically ignored. The survey speaks only of ports, roads, fires, deaths, radiation sickness, the influence of the bomb on Japanese surrender and warfighting morale. I took understandable issue with that omission, so I decided that would be my criticism, my answer. But, as I pushed my argument further and kept asking “okay, but why?” as I made each subsequent point, I kept landing on my arch nemesis – psychiatry. Now, this isn’t something I could exactly center my international relations essay on. It can be made re...

survivors guilt

tw / death of a parent, suicide, drug use, psychiatric abuse, self harm, brief mention of suicide methods i'm sat in bed, in a position my hip really doesn't like, eating one of the few foods i can for the next few days. it's an aero mousse dessert thing, if you were wondering. yesterday, i got an angry wisdom tooth pulled, and yesterday, i got diagnosed with bipolar disorder on the way to getting said angry wisdom tooth pulled. i knew it was coming - there was no way even the stupidest psychiatrist on their angriest day could see anything else in me. well, except autism, but that's a whole other ballgame. when i went into that long-awaited appointment, in the psych-ward-not-quite (no bedrooms, but certainly a psych ward), i knew what was going to happen when i got out. i would wait a few days, he would consult, he would prescribe. that's exactly what happened, he was right when he said i seemed clued up. bipolar affective disorder type two and lamotrigine tapering ...

in defense of endogenic systems

My system is traumagenic; formed due to childhood trauma. I've long wanted to write about antipsychiatry and mad liberation specifically relating to plurality and systemhood. There's only one way to do that - defend endogenic systems. I hope after this you'll defend them with me, reader. Let me set the scene first. Plurality, or systemhood, refers to an experience where one person has more than one separate identity, sense of self, memory, et cetera; as if more than one person occupies one body. This, generally, is said to come about due to dissociation during childhood trauma. Endogenic systems (shorthand 'endos') are plural systems which did not form due to trauma. There are many ways they could form, but childhood trauma isn't one of them. There's long been infighting in system communities where traumagenic systems ('people with DID/OSDD') see endogenic systems as faking a serious illness, as taking away resources from 'real systems,' and ...